Original book ideaMystery

A Footnote to a Very Bad Idea

An academic copyeditor discovers that footnotes in an unpublished manuscript predict small acts of sabotage around campus. The retired scholar named in its acknowledgments insists the book is a joke, but every attempt to remove a reference gives someone a more dangerous idea.

Create my book Read opening

ImagineYourBook writes a fresh draft from this idea.

How it begins

Footnote thirty-seven predicted the destruction of Elizabeth Cole's lunch.

She read it at eleven forty, while the lunch was still intact in the staff refrigerator.

The sentence above concerned the university's architectural ambitions. The note below it read: The soup in the blue flask will be poured away at twelve sixteen, ostensibly because the container is unlabelled.

Elizabeth had written her name on the flask in permanent marker.

At twelve fourteen she stood in the kitchen pretending to search for a spoon. At twelve fifteen the press director entered, opened the refrigerator and lifted the flask.

'Is this yours?' he asked.

'Yes.'

'Good. I thought it had been here since Friday.'

He returned it to the shelf and left.

Elizabeth took the manuscript from her bag. Footnote thirty-seven now ended: Intervention may preserve lunch while altering the sequence of subsequent events.

She did not eat.

Philip Mercer answered his telephone on the sixth ring. In retirement, apparently, a person could make suspense a hobby.

'Your acknowledgments name me,' she said.

'That was kind of me.'

'I haven't edited the book yet.'

'You sound as though you've started.'

She read him the footnote. He laughed, but not quickly enough.

'Academic humor,' he said.

'It has changed since I read it.'

'Good academic humor does.'

Elizabeth looked at the next note. It concerned a shelf in the archive and a ladder whose inspection sticker would disappear at three.

For twenty years she had corrected references so that readers could trust the distance between a claim and its source. Now the sources seemed to be waiting for her to make the claim possible.

'Professor,' she said, 'I need you to tell me whether this is a joke before somebody decides the ladder is funny.'

On the line, the professor stopped laughing. The first honest sound he had made was the sharp clink of a cup being set down.

Your idea. Your book.

Keep the spark. Change anything.

Create my book

Created with ImagineYourBook. Free to use as inspiration.

Outline and characters

Develop this idea

Choose one clear causal rule for the footnotes and demonstrate it with the harmless lunch before escalating. Elizabeth's editorial expertise must drive experiments, not merely provide jokes about punctuation. Philip's grievance can be understandable without excusing coercion. Plant the imitator's access fairly and keep physical danger non-graphic. The final correction should exploit an established rule rather than introduce a convenient new kind of magic at the climax.

Elizabeth prevents a trivial event predicted in a footnote.
The note updates to acknowledge her intervention.
Philip dismisses the manuscript while revealing prior knowledge.
Later references predict sabotage with genuine safety consequences.
Deleting notes shifts the events rather than stopping them.
Elizabeth traces citations to unpublished proposals rejected by the press.
Philip admits using the manuscript to force attention toward his grievance.
A dangerous imitator exploits the predictions for a separate benefit.
Elizabeth publishes a controlled correction that breaks the causal reference chain.
The manuscript is preserved under restrictions and ordinary safety failures are repaired.

Characters